| The
new board structure may have put an end to deadlock, but it
has become more and more clear that the Executive Director
controls the votes as the tie breaker. For most of the past
year, there have been only two Management members on the Workers'
Comp Board. Unless all members vote unanimously, there is
liable to be a 4-2 (or a tie) vote. One side is satisfied,
and the other is not. Decisions do get made, but the tension
continues.

|
The
news is mixed.
Maine
is following the national trend in the reduction of
the frequency of injuries. Maine actually improved to
the point where the frequency was slightly lower than
the national average, and that resulted in the extension
of benefits for an additional 52 weeks to 416 weeks.
At the same time, countrywide medical costs continue
to rise.
Workers'
Compensation Rankings
National
rankings are not always consistent, mostly because they
use different data. For the most part, Maine is about
in the middle of the pack. However, John Burton still
ranks Maine as a high cost state.
1.
Actuarial & Technical Solutions, Manufacturing Industry
Costs and Statutory Benefit Provisions, 2006 Edition
(using
standard payroll and classifications)
a.
Manufacturing
Industries, Insurance Cost: In
2007, Maine fell to 29 th . In 2006, Maine tied for
27th position. In 2005, Maine ranked 28 out of 45 states
ranked from lowest to highest.
b.
Statutory Benefit Provisions (Wage Replacement Benefits): Maine
's
ranking went to 25 th out of 50 in 2007.Maine
ranked 27 out of 50 (states ranked lowest to highest)
in both 2005 and 2006.
c.
Office
and Clerical Operations, Insurance cost: In
2007, Maine dropped again to 36th out of 45.
In 2006, Maine dropped to 35th out of 45. In 2005, Maine
ranked 34th out of 45 states, states ranked lowest to
highest,
2
. Oregon
Workers' Compensation Premium Rate Ranking :
In 2006, Maine rose
to the 8 th costliest state. In
the 2004 study Maine ranked 13th out of 50 states plus
the District of Columbia . States are ranked highest
to lowest. This study is done every other year.
3.
National
Council of Compensation Insurance (NCCI ):
NCCI
files rates, or loss costs, in 35 states, including
Maine . Maine rose to 9 th place in 2006. In 2005 Maine
ranked 10th out of 35 states on insurance cost, with
states ranked highest to lowest. This study used Maine
payroll by classification to calculate costs and rank
the states.
Good
News: NCCI
files a Rate Decrease for 2008
Each
year the National Council on Compensation Insurance
(NCCI), as the state's designated statistical agent,
files advisory loss costs on behalf of insurers with
the Bureau of Insurance, which represent the portion
of the rates that account for losses and loss adjustment
expenses. These involve factors provided by insurers
called loss cost multipliers which account for such
things as company experience, overhead expenses, taxes,
contingencies, investment income and profit. The advisory
loss costs are multiplied by those factors to form rates
for individual insurance companies. In late 2005, NCCI
made a filing with the Bureau which called for an overall
1.8% increase in advisory loss costs. After a careful
review, the Bureau asked NCCI to amend their filing
downward to a 1.2% increase. For 2007, there is no rate
increase. Two small increases followed by no change
is a positive trend. For
2008, the trend was truly positive: NCCI file a minus
2.2% rate filing!
4.
Workers'
Compensation Policy Review by
John Burton. In most categories, Burton ranks Maine
in a more costly position than other states. . (samples
from the December 2006 volume)
Maine 's average benefits for Temporary total:
14 out of 47
Maine 's ranks #1 in permanent partial average benefits
Maine ranks 22 of 47k for Permanent Total average
benefits.
Maine
ranks 3 out of 47 in all cash benefits.
Maine
ranks 18 th out of 47 in average medical benefits per
case.
This
ranking is derived from the NCCI Annual Statistical
Bulletins and 2002 is the latest year evaluated and
ranked. The ranking is based on 45 states plus the District
of Columbia and the USL&HW Act. Jurisdictions are
ranked from highest to lowest.
The
Supplemental
Benefit Fund Assessment has
decreased since the fund was established. This assessment
funds the reimbursements to employers who made payments
within the deltas of moving PI thresholds and benefit
durations for injuries dating from 1993 to 2000.
In 2002, the rate was 2.64% for insurers and dropped
to 1.64% in 2003; for self-insureds, the rate dropped
from 3.62% to 2.95%. In 2006, the rate for insurers
increased slightly for insurers, and dropped again for
self-insurers. The assessment for self-insurers is 1.58%
of their company's CY2004 aggregate paid losses reported
to the Maine Bureau of Insurance. Initial
funding was $8 mil, but it has cost only $3.5 to run
the fund for the past four years.
Insurers
Self-Insurers
CY 2008 .81% CY
2008 1.8%
CY
2007 .79%
2007 1.9%
CY
2006 0.83%
2006 1.58%
CY
2005 0.82%
2005 1.82%
CY
2004 0.97%
2004 1.84%
CY
2003 1.64%
2003 2.95%
CY
2002 2.64%
2002 3.62%
|

|
There
are things you need to understand! |
|
|
Will
Duration Ever Reach 520 Weeks?
It
is important to understand that there is a financial impact
on all employers for any increase in the duration of benefits.
In
accordance with the directives of Section 213 of the Workers'
Compensation Statute, every year the WCB hires an actuary
to determine if the frequency of claims in Maine is above
or below the national average. If it is below the national
average, the duration of benefits for people who are partially
disabled is extended an additional 52 weeks. In 1993, the
benefit duration started at 260 weeks. The first actuarial
study occurred after the first five years, and in 1999 and
2000, the benefits were extended. Benefit
duration was extended again in 2007; the current duration
of benefits is 412 weeks.
In
anticipation of reaching 520 weeks of duration, insurance
companies adopted 2.7% escrow accounts. The escrow amount
covers the contingency that the Section 213 maximum benefit
duration will be extended from 364 weeks to 520 weeks for
injuries that occur in policy year 2006. Despite claims that
employers have already provided funds for extensions and,
because of that, extensions will have no financial impact,
if the extension does not
occur,
insured employers will receive refunds . If the benefit
duration extension does occur, the premiums will be retained
by the insurers and paid out to injured workers. Any increase
in duration will have a direct impact on self-insured employers
who have not set aside any such accounts.
“
Carriers
in the Maine Insurance Market” (B
ased
on 2006 and 2007 reports by the Staff of the Maine Bureau
of Insurance to Legislators.)
Since
2000, 57 more insurance carriers have entered Maine workers'
Compensation market. In 2006, there were 267 carriers, but
the top ten companies combined write nearly 83% of the business.
MEMIC alone writes almost 65%. No carrier outside of the top
10 account for more than 1% of the written premium. The Maine
's workers' compensation insurance market is becoming more
concentrated (i.e., more business written by fewer carriers
or groups). Though there are more carriers being licensed
and there are no barriers for carriers to enter the market,
Maine Employers' Mutual Insurance Company (MEMIC) is underwriting
a large portion of business.
Self-insured
employers represent 40.3% % of the overall workers' compensation
market in Maine , and self-insurance continues to be a viable
alternative to the insurance market for some employers. The
remaining 59.7% is with insurance companies. For example,
MEMIC has 64.8% of the 59.7% for insurers or 38% of the workers'
comp coverage in Maine . The next highest insurance company
share is 4.3% of the 59.7%.
Although
Maine 's market is becoming more concentrated and MEMIC writes
a large volume of business, there are still many insurers
writing some workers' compensation coverage in Maine and self-insurance
remains a viable alternative for other Maine employers. Insurers,
however, are being more conservative in the selection of business
that they choose to provide coverage for or to renew. An insurer
can decide to non-renew business for any reason as long as
it provides the policyholder with the statutorily required
advance written notice. Furthermore, insurers are less willing
to offer underwriting discounts and some employers have been
moved to higher rating tiers. The end result is that premiums
for those employers are increasing.
Why
are some companies experiencing higher premiums?
Employers
that maintain a safe work environment and control their losses
should continue to see insurers competing for their business
.
New businesses and businesses with unfavorable loss experience
have few options available. With relatively low investment
returns, many insurers have been less likely to offer credits
to attract or retain market share. As a result, many employers
have experienced higher premiums. (Prior to 2000, carriers
had been discounting premiums by applying schedule rating
credits, by issuing dividends and by using lower rates. In
the current market, insurers are less likely to offer discounts
in order to capture or retain business.)
The
impact of 9/11: The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA), signed
into law in 2002, established a temporary Federal program
under which the federal government shares in the cost of terrorist
attacks with the insurance industry. Its intent is to protect
consumers and insurers by addressing market disruptions and
ensuring the continued availability and affordability of insurance
for terrorism risk. It also allowed for a transitional period
for the private markets to stabilize, resume pricing of such
insurance, and build capacity to absorb any future losses.
In workers' compensation, losses may not be excluded from
coverage due to terrorism. In late 2005, Congress voted to
extend TRIA until December, 31, 2007. Since September 2001
reinsurance contracts have excluded coverage for terrorist
acts, though primary insurers are still liable for that exposure.
This could further disrupt the market since many insurers
may decide against writing accounts where there are high concentrations
of employees at a single location.
Frequency
of indemnity claims continues to decline and this helps keep
loss costs down. Conversely, costs for indemnity (lost time
wage replacement) and medical claims continue to increase.
Medical benefits have increased a percentage to 52% percent
of the total benefit costs in Maine and medical inflation
is greater than the Consumer Price Index.
Employer
assessments for the Worker's Comp Board will increase.
The Workers' Compensation Board had gotten into a pattern
of budget increases . The Legislature is
inclined to support these budget increases by changes in the
statute. Any budget increases would be funded by an increased
assessments on employers and insurers and not come out of
the General Fund.

|
The
bottom line is:
Employers
need to be active and proactive in
stopping the increased costs in Maine's
comp system! |
|